If
you have received a claim denial from your Medicare contractor you do
have the right to submit an appeal. If you do not take assignment on
the claim, your appeal rights can be limited.
See section at the bottom on Clerical Reopening when an appeal is not indicated.
First level of appeal: Redetermination
A redetermination is an examination of a claim by fiscal intermediary (FI), carrier, or MAC personnel who are different from the personnel who made the initial claim determination. The appellant (the individual filing the appeal) has 120 days from the date of receipt of the initial claim determination to file an appeal. A redetermination must be requested in writing. A minimum monetary threshold is not required to request a redetermination.
Second level of appeal: Reconsideration
A party to the redetermination may request a reconsideration if dissatisfied with the redetermination decision. A qualified independent contractor (QIC) will conduct the reconsideration. The QIC reconsideration process allows for an independent review of medical necessity issues by a panel of physicians or other health care professionals. A minimum monetary threshold is not required to request a reconsideration.
Third level of appeal: Hearing by an administrative law judge (ALJ)
If at least $140 remains in controversy following the qualified independent contractor's (QIC's) decision, a party to the reconsideration may request an administrative law judge (ALJ) hearing within 60 days of receipt of the reconsideration decision. Appellants must send notice of the ALJ hearing request to all parties to the QIC for reconsideration. ALJ hearings are conducted by the Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals (OMHA).
By clicking here you will find information on the OMHA website.
Fourth level of appeal: Review by the Medicare Appeals Council
If a party to an ALJ hearing is dissatisfied with the ALJ's decision, the party may request a review by the Medicare Appeals Council. There are no requirements regarding the amount of money in controversy. The request for Medicare Appeals Council review must be submitted in writing within 60 days of receipt of the ALJ's decision, and must specify the issues and findings that are being contested.
By clicking here you will find information on the Medicare Operations Division/Medicare Appeals Council.
Fifth level of appeal: Judicial review
If $1,400 or more is still in controversy following the Medicare Appeals Council's decision, a party may request judicial review before a Federal District Court judge. The appellant must request a Federal District Court hearing within 60 days of receipt of the Medicare Appeals Council's decision.
• The Medicare Appeals Council's decision will contain information about the procedures for requesting judicial review.
Additional resources
Minor errors or omissions on some Part B claims can be corrected for reprocessing using the clerical reopening process.
There are two ways to initiate this process:
Common clerical errors consist of:
See section at the bottom on Clerical Reopening when an appeal is not indicated.A redetermination is an examination of a claim by fiscal intermediary (FI), carrier, or MAC personnel who are different from the personnel who made the initial claim determination. The appellant (the individual filing the appeal) has 120 days from the date of receipt of the initial claim determination to file an appeal. A redetermination must be requested in writing. A minimum monetary threshold is not required to request a redetermination.
Second level of appeal: Reconsideration
A party to the redetermination may request a reconsideration if dissatisfied with the redetermination decision. A qualified independent contractor (QIC) will conduct the reconsideration. The QIC reconsideration process allows for an independent review of medical necessity issues by a panel of physicians or other health care professionals. A minimum monetary threshold is not required to request a reconsideration.
Third level of appeal: Hearing by an administrative law judge (ALJ)
If at least $140 remains in controversy following the qualified independent contractor's (QIC's) decision, a party to the reconsideration may request an administrative law judge (ALJ) hearing within 60 days of receipt of the reconsideration decision. Appellants must send notice of the ALJ hearing request to all parties to the QIC for reconsideration. ALJ hearings are conducted by the Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals (OMHA).
By clicking here you will find information on the OMHA website.If a party to an ALJ hearing is dissatisfied with the ALJ's decision, the party may request a review by the Medicare Appeals Council. There are no requirements regarding the amount of money in controversy. The request for Medicare Appeals Council review must be submitted in writing within 60 days of receipt of the ALJ's decision, and must specify the issues and findings that are being contested.
By clicking here you will find information on the Medicare Operations Division/Medicare Appeals Council.Fifth level of appeal: Judicial review
If $1,400 or more is still in controversy following the Medicare Appeals Council's decision, a party may request judicial review before a Federal District Court judge. The appellant must request a Federal District Court hearing within 60 days of receipt of the Medicare Appeals Council's decision.
• The Medicare Appeals Council's decision will contain information about the procedures for requesting judicial review.
Additional resources
Within the CMS websites you will find information related to the five levels in the Part A and Part B appeals process.
CMS resource materials available for download
CMS Internet-only manuals: Publication 100-04
• Chapter 29– Appeals of Claims Decisions
• Chapter 34– Reopening and Revision of Claim Determinations and Decisions
Minor errors or omissions on some Part B claims can be corrected for reprocessing using the clerical reopening process.
There are two ways to initiate this process:
• Telephone reopening requests via the interactive voice response (IVR) allows providers/customers to request telephone re-openings on certain claims. For the IVR reopening request help sheet, click here
• For reopening requests in writing, use the clerical reopening .
Common clerical errors consist of:
• Mathematical or computational mistakes
• Transposed procedure or diagnostic codes
• Inaccurate data entry
• Misapplication of a fee schedule
• Computer errors
• Denial of claims as duplicates which party believes incorrectly identified as duplicate
• Incorrect data items such as provider number, modifier, date of service
That
is how I start to feel when reading about billing “Services and
Supplies Furnished Incident to a Physician’s/NPP’s Professional
Service.”
For my enlightenment and hopefully yours, I have attempted to glean the basics from about 10 pages in section 60 of the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 15 “Covered Medical and Other Health Services”.
Let’s
start with an easy concept: An incident to service or supply is a
service or supply not covered in one of the other benefit categories.
The other benefit categories are:
To see the details of services that fall into these benefit categories, you can access the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 15 by
Supplies commonly considered “incident to”: gauze, ointments, bandages, oxygen
Services
of auxiliary personnel are considered incidental to a physician service
when they assist in rendering the service, and the charge is included
in the physician’s bill. This also applies if auxiliary personnel
perform a subsequent service as part of a course of treatment initiated
by the supervising physician.
Special Rules for Homebound Patients and Incident to Services
Services
that can be covered incident to under general supervision: Injections,
venipuncture, EKGs, therapeutic exercises, insertion and irrigation of
sterile catheter, changing of catheters and collection of catheterized
specimen for urinalysis and culture, dressing changes, replacement
and/or insertion of nasogastric tubes, removal of fecal impaction,
sputum collection for stain and cultures, paraffin bath therapy for
hands and/or feet, teaching and training the patient for care of
colostomy, ileostomy, or tracheostomy, testing urine, care of diabetic
feet and blood pressure monitoring.

To
qualify for Medicare PQRS incentive payments, EPs must sufficiently
report on the applicable quality information measures. In the PQRS 2013
program, there are several hundred measures.
To help navigate through this complex process, you can access the “Getting Started” page of the CMS PQRS website by
Advanced Practice management software like
To
qualify for the Medicare EHR incentive payments eligible professionals
(EPs) must utilize certified meaningful use EHR technology. Proof of
meaningful use can only be demonstrated by reporting clinical quality
measures (CQMs) as well as the meaningful use measures.
Providers wishing to purchase certified EHR software can access a list of options on the CMS site by
In 2013, EPs may satisfy the meaningful use objective to report CQMs to CMS by reporting them through:
EPs
who successfully participate in PQRS and EHR can receive an incentive
in 2013 and avoid the 2015 payment adjustment for both programs.
Participating
in both the PQRS and EHR programs in 2014 and beyond is being
simplified by CMS with the alignment of several of key components.
Telehealth Services: These services would be expanded to include areas designated as health professional shortage areas (HPSAs)
located in rural census tracts of urban areas as determined by the
Office of Rural Health Policy. Additionally, transitional care
management services would be considered eligible telehealth services.
Revisions To The Practice Expense Geographic Adjustment:
PFS rates are calculated based on numerous factors as required by the
Medicare law. The main goal is to adjust payments according to
geographic differences in practice costs. To accomplish this, CMS
assigns separate geographic practice cost indices (GPCIs)
to the work, practice expenses (PE), and malpractice cost components of
each of more than 7,000 physicians’ services. The proposed changes to
the GPCIs would be phased in over 2014-2015 and are:
Medicare Economic Index: MEI,
the price index used to update the PFS for inflation, and sustainable
growth rate are used in when calculating the total payment amounts in
the PFS. The proposal reflects 2012 recommendations by a Technical
Advisory Panel CMS that will revise the calculation of the MEI as well
as changes in the RVU and GPCI weights assigned to work and practice
expense to align with the MEI.
Miss-valued Codes:
CMS as part of the ACA, has identified miss-valued codes requiring
adjustment to payment rates. There are more than 200 codes with
proposed rate changes. These codes currently reimburse higher for
services performed in an office versus the fee paid in a hospital
outpatient setting or ASC. The proposed rates would reflect a PFS
office place of service reimbursement that is equal to the sum of the
reimbursement to the facility and practitioner when service are rendered
in an outpatient hospital or ACS place of service. There have been
additional miss-valued codes identified by Medicare Contractors based on
claim review that have proposed reimbursement changes.
Application of Therapy Caps to Critical Access Hospitals: They
are proposing outpatient therapy services furnished in CAHs are added
to the therapy cap limitations. This would apply two per beneficiary of
the following outpatient therapy services:
Future change for 2015 included in this proposal:
Primary Care and Complex Chronic Care Management:
The proposal would provide for an additional, separate payment for a
practitioner that provides non-face-to-face complex chronic care
management services for Medicare beneficiaries who have multiple,
significant chronic conditions (two or more). This is how it would
work:
Bladder tumors are also grouped into several types by the types of cells it contains:
Cancer that is confined to the lining of the bladder is called non-invasive or superficial bladder cancer.
The most common risk factors for developing bladder cancer include:
Symptoms of bladder cancer frequently consist of:
If bladder cancer has not been ruled out by exam ad UA, further testing for definitive diagnosis may include:
Cancer treatments for bladder cancer include: